The International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP) Certificate required by MARPOL is issued to CHINA flag ships by the（）.

A . IMO B . CCS C . USCG D . PICC

A . is drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf B . moves to a new drilling location in U-Swaters C . engages in a voyage to a port of another country which is a party of MARPOL D . All of the above

A . upwards B . downwards C . outwards D . forward

A . about marine pollution prevention B . covering safety of life C . about marine D . about ship and port security

A . lower B . higher C . smaller D . bigger

A . in order that B . because of C . in order to D . owing to

A . operate B . check C . install D . overhaul

A . by using of fresh water B . with compressed air C . by using of sea water D . with chemical compound

A . fuel oil B . sludge C . oil refuse D . All of the above

A . Not mention in the paragraph B . Not clear C . Wrong D . Right

A . 150；300 B . 150；400 C . 500；1600 D . 500；2000

A . it exceeds 3 years from date of issue B . an alteration approved by the Captain of the Port is made C . an intermediate survey has not be conducted within 12 months from the date that the IOPP was issued D . the vessel is transferred to the flag of another country

The first is the success of antivivisection campaigners in lampooning animal research as outdated, intentionally cruel, "bad" science, which achieves nothing. All drugs and procedures developed with the help of animal tests are said to be dangerous. The occasional failure of animal testing to identify a dangerous drug is developed as an argument for abandoning safety tests involving animals altogether--with no mention of the terrible human suffering that this would cause. They say that "alternative" methods already exist for all animal experiments, but the fact is that the law specifically forbids animal use if there is any alternative. The second reason is that scientists and doctors have failed to oppose such misrepresentation. In the early 1990s, animal rights campaigning in the US was met with much more forthright defense, not only by the major scientific societies, funding agencies and medical organizations, but also by the US government. To be positive, there are many encouraging features of the New Scientist poll. Interestingly, the public seems to employ the same kind of utilitarian philosophy that underpins the law in Britain--weighing potential benefits against the species involved (thus, monkeys are more "valuable" than mice) and the likelihood of suffering. Clearly, people in Britain do not recognize the essential link between animal research and testing and the medical treatments that they receive. Only 18 percent of those who had taken (or had a close family member who had taken a drug prescribed for a serious illness realized that the drug had been tested on animals, as all drugs are. Obviously, a large majority of those surveyed believe that they can happily benefit from medical treatment without taking advantage of animal research. No wonder so many people oppose it when asked the straight yes/no question. The views of the public must be respected. But this poll tells us that, while they are open to persuasion, their reaction is based on misunderstanding. The responsibility for providing honest evidence for the public lies not just with those who use animals in their research, but with other scientists who depend on that work. It lies with the doctors who benefit from animal research, with the pharmaceuticals and biotech industries, and the medical charities and funding age, les whose work would be crippled without it. But most of all, responsibility rests with government, which should cultivate serious and transparent debate between those of different opinion, and provide the public--especially young people--with the honest evidence they need and deserve. In the first sentence of Paragraph 3, "such misrepresentation" refers to ______. A．the idea that other methods can be substituted for animal research B．the claim that animal experiment is intentionally cruel C．the belief that all drugs developed with animal tests are dangerous D．the fact that scientists and medical organizations support animal experimentation

A．40% B．30% C．25% D．20% E．15%

IOPP(国际防油污证书international oil pollution prevention certificate )适用于 ()总吨及以上的油船和()总吨以上其他船舶。 A、150，300 B、150，400 C、500，1600 D、500，2000

<img src='https://img2.soutiyun.com/ask/uploadfile/4083001-4086000/cd6853a639c010a2fe40c900fbef0ffc.gif' /> 此题为多项选择题。

While three of them, including Lehman Brothers, take a dim view of the prospects for American shares, the other four have either marginally increased their allocations, or have maintained them at the same levels as in the previous quarter. Lehman Brothers seems to have decided that the prospect for German shares is better than it is for American ones. Its allocation for American equities dropped by seven percentage points, to 45% of its equity holdings; while its German share portfolio increased by six percentage points, to 11%. Lehman's share allocation to America has dropped, even as its overall equity holdings have increased. Daiwa and Standard Life are the other two that have cut back on American equities. But Credit Suisse continues to be a cheerleader for American shares. Following its ten percentage-point increase in the third quarter, the Swiss firm increased its exposure to American equities once again in the fourth quarter. Commerz International appears to share Credit Suisse's bullish outlook: its American equity holdings have increased by four percentage points, to 490. Julius Baer is extremely bullish on American equities, with 60% of its equity funds parked there. But the average American equity holdings, among our institutional investors dropped by a percentage point in the fourth quarter. British equities seem to have become attractive—all our investors have increased their allocations. Credit Suisse, which in the third quarter cut its investment in British shares, appears to have changed its mind. It has increased its allocation by four percentage points, taking the total to 9%. On the other hand, Japanese shares have been given the thumbs-down: all our investors save Julius Baer (unchanged) and Credit Suisse (slightly up) have moved funds out of Japanese equities. It is a relatively similar story for Japanese bonds, where everybody apart from Commerz International has either dropped their yen-denominated bond holdings, or kept them unchanged. Robeco Group seems decidedly bearish, for it has sharply, cut its allocation, from 24% to 15%. Lehman Brothers, appears to have got the timing right, by raising its allocation of dollar-denominated bonds in the fourth quarter. Its increase was followed by the Fed interest-rate cut on January 3rd. Will Lehman's bearish timing prove right for American shares, too？ Lehman Brothers______. A．has increased its equity and bond allocation in America B．pays less attention to the equity holdings because of the American economy's slowdown C．is pessimistic about the American prospect and cautious about its allocation D．is as bearish as other institutional investors

此题为判断题(对，错)。