-
How are your parents?（）
A . I'm OK, thanks
B . She is well, thanks
C . They are both fine, thanks
D . He is well, thank
-
public class Parent { int change（） {…} } class Child extends Parent { } Which methods can be added into class Child？（）
A . public int change（）{}
B . int chang（int i）{}
C . private int change（）{}
D . abstract int chang（）{}
-
public class Parent{ public void change（int x）{} } public class Child extends Parent{ //覆盖父类change方法 } 下列哪个声明是正确的覆盖了父类的change方法？（）
A . protected void change（int x）{}
B . public void change（int x， int y）{}
C . public void change（String s）{}
D . public void change（int x）{}
-
public class Parent{ public void change（int x）{} } public class Child extends Parent{ //覆盖父类change方法 } 下列哪个声明是正确的覆盖了父类的change方法？（）
A . protected void change（int x）{}
B . public void change（int x， int y）{}
C . public void change（String s）{}
D . public void change（int x）{}
-
当物体被使用Parent约束后，哪些属性可以被约束？（）
A . 位移
B . 旋转
C . 缩放
D . 隐藏
-
中亲优势（mid-parent heterosis）
-
超亲优势（over-parent heterosis）
-
Avant, mes parents à la campagne.
-
Most vegetables we buy in winter are nurtured in the _________.
-
给定JAVA代码，如下：Class Parent{public void count() {System.out.println(10%3) ;}}public class Test extends Parent{public void count() {System.out.println(10/3) ;}public static void main(Stringargs[]) {Parent p = new Test() ;p.count() ;}}运行编译后，输出结果是（）。
-
给出下面代码： public class Parent{int change(){ }} class Child extends Parent{} 可加入类Child中的方法是（ ）。
-
以下是应用continue命令的一种示例结构continue命令一旦被执行，while命令即被终止d220bd38ab8bd8ca87090f4eca5374c3.jpg
-
Education is seen as a process of nurturing individuality, of fostering distinctive qualities that already＿ within each individual.
-
The house_____my parents.
-
( )room is next to their parents’.
-
4. How do parents monitor instantmessaging? Parents .
-
The 4 focuses on the business plan, while the parent company focuses on the strategic plan.
-
分析如下所示的Java代码，则选项中的说法正确的是（ ）。 class Parent{ public String name; public Parent(String pName){ this.name = pName; } } public class Test extends Parent { //1 public Test(String Name){ //2 name=\hello
-
when……parents（）
A．……o
B．……w
C．……a
D．……x
-
选择器中parent div:nth-child（2)表示什么（)A、匹配ID为parent 元素的第一个子元素B、匹配ID为p
选择器中parent div:nth-child(2)表示什么()
A、匹配ID为parent 元素的第一个子元素
B、匹配ID为parent 元素的第二个子元素
-
—What were you up to when your parents came in？—I______for a while and______some reading.
A．was playing; was going to do
B．played; did
C．had played; was going to do
D．had played; did
-
For eight years the Clinton Administration preached the need for exquisite sensitivity to the Russians. They'd had a rough time. They needed nurturing from their new American friends.
They got it. We fed them loans, knowing that much of the money would disappear corruptly. We turned away from atrocity in Chechnya lest we weaken the new Russian state. But most important, we went weak in the knees on missile defense. The prospect of American antiballistic missiles upset the Russians. And upsetting the Russians was something we simply were not to do.
The Russians cannot keep up with American technology. And they fear that an American missile shield will render obsolete their last remnant of greatness: their monster, nuclear-tipped missiles. So they insist that we adhere to a 1972 treaty signed with the defunct Soviet Union that prohibited either side from developing missile defenses. That the treaty is obsolete-it long predates the world of rogue states racing to acquire missile-launched weapons of mass destruction-does not concern the Russians. Withdraw from the treaty, they said, and you have destroyed the "strategic stability" on which the peace of the world depends.
The Clinton Administration took that threat seriously-so seriously that for eight years it equivocated on building an American ABM system. Finally, President Clinton promised to decide by June 2000. Come June, he punted.
Eight years, and no defense. But the bear was content.
Bear contentment was never a high priority for Ronald Reagan. He offered a different model for dealing with the Russians. The 1980s model went by the name of peace through strength. But it was more than that. It was judicious but unapologetic unilateralism. It was willingness-in the face of threats and bluster from foreign adversaries and nervous apprehension from domestic critics-to do what the U.S. needed to do for its own security. Regardless.
It was Reagan who famously proposed a missile shield, and even more famously refused to barter it away at the Reykjavik summit, an event many historians consider the turning point in the cold war. That marked the beginning of the Soviets' definitive realization that they were going to lose the arms race to the U.S.-and that neither threats nor cajoling would dissuade the U.S. from running it.
This decade starts with a return to the unabashed unilateralism of the 1980s. It began last year with a speech by George W. Bush proposing that the U.S. build weapons to meet American needs-and not to accommodate the complaints or gain the agreement of other countries. For 40 years the U.S. would not cut its offensive nuclear missiles except in conjunction with Soviet cuts. Bush's refreshing question was: Why？ We don't need Rnssians cutting our offensive weapons through arms-control treaties. And we don't need Russians telling us whether or not to build defensive weapons.
This was the genesis of the Bush Doctrine, now taking shape as the Administration takes power. Its motto is, we build to suit-ourselves. Accordingly, the President and the Secretary of Defense have been unequivocal about their determination to go ahead with a missile defense.
They staked their claim. And what happened？ Did the sky fall, as the Clinton Russian experts warned？ On the contrary. Convinced at last of American seriousness, the Russians immediately acquiesced. After just one month of Bush, Moscow has come forward with its very own missile-defense plan. The fact that it is not well sketched out and that it is in part designed to split the U.S. off from Europe is beside the point. The Russians have responded, as did the Soviets before them, to American firmness. Faced with reality, they accommodate it.
Who defines reality; there lies the difference between this Administration and the last. Clinton let Russian opposition define reality. Bush, like Reagan, understands that the U.S. can resha
A．the Russians understood that they needed nurturing from their new American friends
B．the Russians knew Americans will surely help them
C．upsetting the Russians was something the Americans simply were not to do
D．the Americans shouldn't worry about upsetting the Russians
-
- A-t-elle passé ses vacances chez ses parents ？ - Oui, elle les a chez ses parents.
-
A few years ago it was common to speak of a generation gap between young people and their elders.Parents said that children did not respect and listen to them, while children said that their parents did not understand them at all.What had gone wrong？ Why had the generation gap suddenly appeared？ Actually, the generation gap has been around for a long time.Many people argue that it is built into every part of our society.
One important cause of the generation gap is the opportunity that young people have to choose their own ways of life.In a more traditional society, when children grow up, they are expected to live in the same area as their parents, to marry people that their parents know and like, and often to continue the family jobs.In our society, young people often travel great distances for their education, move out of the family at an early age, marry or live with people whom their parents have never met, and choose jobs different from those of their parents.
In our society, parents often expect their children to do better than they did, to find better jobs, to make more money and to do all the things that they were unable to do.Often, that is another cause of the gap between them.Often, they discover that they have very little in common with each other.
Finally, the speed at which changes take place in our society is the third cause of the gap between the generations.In a traditional culture, senior people are valued for their knowledge, but in our society the knowledge of a lifetime may become out of date.The young and the old seem to live in two very different worlds, separated by different skills and abilities.No doubt, the generation gap will continue in American life for some time to come.
1.The first paragraph tells us that ______.
A、the problem of the generation gap draws much attention from people
B、it is out of date to talk about the generation gap
C、children and parents are trying to understand each other
D、it is very important for people to frequently communicate with each other
2.In a more traditional society, old people_______.
A、have their children respect and listen to them
B、do not care for their children at all
C、expect their children to rebel against them
D、do not live together with their children
3.In American society young people________.
A、do not need to find jobs
B、leave home at an early age
C、have better education than their parents
D、marry people younger than them
4.Which of the following is NOT the cause of the generation gap______.
A、Young people like to depend more on themselves.
B、Parents do not love their children dearly.
C、American society changes rapidly.
D、Parents expect too much of their children.
5.The main idea of the passage is ________.
A、that the generation gap needs considering
B、when the generation gap is necessary in American society
C、why the generation gap exist
D、how we can reduce the generation gap
