Without potatoes there would be no with your hamburger

A . Define user profiles and set the CPU_PER_CALL limit.  B . Define a SWITCH_TIME for a plan in the Resource Manager.  C . Create a batch job that checks V$SESSION_LONGOPS；the batch job alters the session priority of the long running operations.  D . Create a user defined event in the Oracle Enterprise Manager， which monitors V$SESSION_LONGOPS.

A . alog B . swcons C . lscons D . syslog

A . Telnet into the machine and do a shutdown -Fr B . Log into ASMI as Administrator and use ASMI menus C . Log into the service processor using WebSM and use ASMI menus D . Use the off button which is located to the left below the LED

A . auto-setup  B . auto assign  C . no telephony-service  D . auto telephony-service  E . telephony-service auto  F . telephony-service setu

A . Add a new 802.11a WLAN B . Increase the Layer 2 and Layer 3 security of the WLAN C . Increase the throughput for the wireless clients D . Add new services （such as voice） over the WLAN

The first is the success of antivivisection campaigners in lampooning animal research as outdated, intentionally cruel, "bad" science, which achieves nothing. All drugs and procedures developed with the help of animal tests are said to be dangerous. The occasional failure of animal testing to identify a dangerous drug is developed as an argument for abandoning safety tests involving animals altogether--with no mention of the terrible human suffering that this would cause. They say that "alternative" methods already exist for all animal experiments, but the fact is that the law specifically forbids animal use if there is any alternative. The second reason is that scientists and doctors have failed to oppose such misrepresentation. In the early 1990s, animal rights campaigning in the US was met with much more forthright defense, not only by the major scientific societies, funding agencies and medical organizations, but also by the US government. To be positive, there are many encouraging features of the New Scientist poll. Interestingly, the public seems to employ the same kind of utilitarian philosophy that underpins the law in Britain--weighing potential benefits against the species involved (thus, monkeys are more "valuable" than mice) and the likelihood of suffering. Clearly, people in Britain do not recognize the essential link between animal research and testing and the medical treatments that they receive. Only 18 percent of those who had taken (or had a close family member who had taken a drug prescribed for a serious illness realized that the drug had been tested on animals, as all drugs are. Obviously, a large majority of those surveyed believe that they can happily benefit from medical treatment without taking advantage of animal research. No wonder so many people oppose it when asked the straight yes/no question. The views of the public must be respected. But this poll tells us that, while they are open to persuasion, their reaction is based on misunderstanding. The responsibility for providing honest evidence for the public lies not just with those who use animals in their research, but with other scientists who depend on that work. It lies with the doctors who benefit from animal research, with the pharmaceuticals and biotech industries, and the medical charities and funding age, les whose work would be crippled without it. But most of all, responsibility rests with government, which should cultivate serious and transparent debate between those of different opinion, and provide the public--especially young people--with the honest evidence they need and deserve. In the first sentence of Paragraph 3, "such misrepresentation" refers to ______. A．the idea that other methods can be substituted for animal research B．the claim that animal experiment is intentionally cruel C．the belief that all drugs developed with animal tests are dangerous D．the fact that scientists and medical organizations support animal experimentation

In the ancient world, as today, most boys played with some kinds of toys and most girls with some other. In societies where social roles are rigidly determined, boys pattern their play after the activities of their fathers and girls after the tasks of their mothers. This is true because boys and girls are being prepared, even in play, to step into the roles and responsibilities of the adult world. What is remarkable about the history of toys is not so much how they changed over the centuries but how much they have remained the same. The changes have been mostly in terms of craftsmanship, mechanics, and technology. It is the universality of toys with regard to their development in all part of the world and their persistence to the present that is amazing. In Egypt, America, China, Japan, and even among the Arctic peoples, generally the same kinds of toys appeared. Variations depended on local customs and ways of life because toys imitate their surroundings. Nearly every civilization had dolls, little weapons, toy soldiers, tiny animals and vehicles. (4) A．Because boys and girls are being prepared for different social roles. B．Because boys are more courageous. C．Because toy makers want to diversify their products. D．Because parents have different expectations for boys and girls.

A．they were so dependent on potatoes that they refused to eat anything else. B．they were forced to leave their homeland and move to America. C．the weather conditions in Ireland were not suitable for growing potatoes. D．the potato harvest was bad.

A．favorite B．alike C．favorable D．likely

A．meaningless B．monotonous C．fascinating D．awesome

A.lain B.lay C.lied

A、on earth. B、at a distance. C、in sight. D、in place.

是 否

是 否